2026年7月24日 星期五

留下 Staying




热带的忧郁,是你以为所有发光的物体都是有温度的。月亮,以及稀疏的星子,恣意狂欢的夜。你不曾告诉我,热带的孤枕,也有取暖的渴望。

二十年前,初来新加坡的一个不眠之夜我写下了这些句子。

我的渴望,在三个月后必修课元明清文学的最后片刻,在那首真心英雄唱的把握生命里的每一分钟,全力以赴我们心中的梦。不经历风雨,怎么见彩虹,没有人能随随便便成功七十双热切的眼睛里闪着泪光,有纸条传来,写着:希望老师陪着我们毕业。得到了彷徨的回应。

我申请延长海外研修,直到期满,下定決心离开台湾。我给原来的工作单位和南洋理工大学中文系的同事们都发了电邮。邮件的题目就是:留下。我說:

凡走过的,必留下痕迹。有的人留下的是珠玑;有的人留下的是垃圾。

而我,能留下什么呢?

这是我来到新加坡以后,才意识到,并且开始认真思考的问题。

决定留在南大,我以为一个学术单位不缺专业的研究人员,而师资尚未完备的南大中文系需要我的一点力量。尤其体会到,自己正在为南洋一带的华人文化与文学培养传承者,这是我在台湾教书时从未经验过的责任感。

人生无法重来,我希望我的人生抉择不是一厢情愿。

那天是 2008 5 9 日,中文系准备从澳洲聘任新的系主任,我提出了自己的看法。511日,我特地去参拜了南洋大学的真迹牌坊,默默许愿。。

我留下,是因为相信。

相信一个刚刚成立不久的中文系,有望一起建设;相信华文教育在这个岛国,昂首迎向未来;也相信,一位教师除了研究与写作,还可以为一个文化共同体做一点事情。

如今二十年过去,我常常想,如果当年知道后来会经历的一切,我还会不会作出同样的决定?

后来,我经历过办公室政治,经历过误解与伤害;曾经为了维护自己的尊严与公义,不得不寻求法律的协助和保护。那些日子非常不好过,深深在我心底烙下阴影。

今天回头望去,我发现:当年真正留下来的理由,并不是预想一切顺心称意,而是因为所有的经历,都成为生命未知的一部分。

如果没有留下,我不会在2014年创发文图学;不会在2017年与志同道合的朋友们成立文图学会,也不会一路走到今天,让文图学从一个研究构想,逐渐成为许多学者共同参与、不断发展的学术视野。如果没有留下,我不会担任中文系主任,与同事一起规划中文系的发展。

这些年来,我最难忘的,并不是出版了多少本书,也不是获得了什么奖项,而是文物艺术导览或公众演讲结束以后总有人走过来,对我说:原来博物馆可以这样看。”“我竟然听得懂大学教授讲的话!

还有学生告诉我:我没想到会期待上您的古典文学课。

每一次听见这些话,我都庆幸,当初留下来的决定,是值得的。

我渐渐明白,一个学者真正留下来的,不一定是自己的名字,而是别人度过人生的方式。或许,这正是我二十年来最大的收获。

新加坡给予我的,不只是一个谋生的职场,而是一种观看世界的立场。

它让我站在不同文化交会之处,重新理解中国,也重新理解东亚,更重新理解自己。

人年轻的时候,总想着到哪里去。

后来才知道,更重要的是,在哪里留下什么。

二十年前,我留下,是因为有人希望我留下。

二十年后,我还在这里,还有许多值得继续努力的工作;还有许多文化值得继续传承创新;还有许多人愿意和我一起相信,人文学并没有淘汰,阅读、审美与思考,依然能够温暖这个时代。

于是,我终于明白——“留下,是在一片土地上,把自己慢慢活成一道风景;把一点点微弱的光,继续照亮前方的道路。

当年那个住进校园宿舍、望着热带夜空的异乡人,不会知道二十年后的今天,会写下这篇文章。而今天的我,只想轻轻对二十年前的自己说一句:刚刚好,你选择了留下。

 

——纪念2026716日,移居新加坡20年。

 

2026718日,新加坡《联合早报》上若水专栏。

 

Staying

I Lo-fen

The melancholy of the tropics lies in believing that everything that shines gives off warmth. The moon, a scattering of stars, a night reveling without restraint. You never told me that even a solitary pillow in the tropics longs for warmth.

Twenty years ago, during a sleepless night shortly after arriving in Singapore, I wrote these lines.

Three months later, in the final moments of the compulsory course “Literature of the Yuan, Ming, and Qing Dynasties,” my longing received a hesitant response. As the song “True Heroes” played—

“Seize every minute of life,
Give everything for the dream in our hearts.
Without weathering storms, how can we see the rainbow?
No one can succeed without effort…”

tears glistened in seventy pairs of eager eyes. A note was passed to me. It read: “We hope you will stay with us until we graduate.”

I applied to extend my overseas research leave to its full term and resolved to leave Taiwan. I sent emails to my former institution and to my colleagues in the Chinese Division at Nanyang Technological University. The subject line was simply: “Staying.”

I wrote:

“Wherever we have passed, we inevitably leave traces behind. Some leave pearls and gems; others leave rubbish.

What, then, can I leave behind?

It was only after coming to Singapore that I became aware of this question and began to contemplate it seriously.

In deciding to stay at NTU, I believed that an academic institution would never lack professional researchers, but the still-developing Chinese Division needed whatever strength I could offer. Above all, I came to realise that I was helping to nurture those who would carry forward Chinese culture and literature in Nanyang. This was a sense of responsibility I had never experienced while teaching in Taiwan.

Life cannot be lived again. I hope that the choice I have made is not merely wishful thinking.”

That day was 9 May 2008. The Chinese Division was preparing to appoint a new head from Australia, and I offered my views. On 11 May, I made a special visit to “pay homage” to the “authentic” archway of Nanyang University and silently made a wish.

I stayed because I believed.

I believed that a recently established Chinese Division could be built together; I believed that Chinese-language education on this island could hold its head high and embrace the future; and I believed that, beyond research and writing, a teacher could still do something for a cultural community.

Now that twenty years have passed, I often wonder: had I known then everything I would later experience, would I still have made the same decision?

In the years that followed, I experienced office politics, misunderstandings, and hurt. To defend my dignity and uphold justice, I once had no choice but to seek legal assistance and protection. Those were extremely difficult days, leaving deep shadows imprinted upon my heart.

Looking back today, I realise that the true reason I stayed was not because I expected everything to proceed smoothly and according to my wishes, but because every experience would become part of life’s unknowable unfolding.

Had I not stayed, I would not have founded Text and Image Studies in 2014. I would not have established the Text and Image Studies Society with like-minded friends in 2017, nor would I have travelled this far, allowing Text and Image Studies to grow from a research concept into an academic perspective in which many scholars now participate and which continues to develop. Had I not stayed, I would not have served as Head of the Chinese Division and worked with my colleagues to plan its future development.

What I remember most vividly from these years is not how many books I have published or what awards I have received. It is that, after a guided tour of cultural relics and art or a public lecture, someone will invariably come up to me and say, “I never knew a museum could be viewed this way,” or, “I can actually understand what a university professor is saying!”

Students have also told me, “I never imagined that I would look forward to your classical literature class.”

Every time I hear these words, I feel grateful that my decision to stay was worthwhile.

Gradually, I came to understand that what a scholar truly leaves behind is not necessarily her own name, but the way other people live their lives. Perhaps this has been my greatest gain over the past twenty years.

What Singapore has given me is not merely a workplace in which to earn a living, but a standpoint from which to view the world.

Standing at the confluence of different cultures, I have been able to understand China anew, to understand East Asia anew, and, even more importantly, to understand myself anew.

When we are young, we are always thinking about where we should go.

Only later do we realise that what matters more is what we leave behind, wherever we may be.

Twenty years ago, I stayed because someone hoped that I would stay.

Twenty years later, I am still here. There is still much worthwhile work to pursue; there are still many cultures whose traditions deserve to be carried forward and renewed; and there are still many people willing to believe with me that the humanities have not become obsolete—that reading, aesthetic appreciation, and thought can still bring warmth to this age.

And so, I finally understand: “staying” means slowly living oneself into a landscape upon a piece of land, and allowing one’s faint glimmer of light to continue illuminating the road ahead.

The stranger who moved into a campus apartment and gazed at the tropical night sky could never have known that, twenty years later, she would write this essay. Today, I only wish to say softly to the person I was twenty years ago:

“It was just right—you chose to stay.”

—In commemoration of 16 July 2026, marking twenty years since I moved to Singapore.

 

18 July 2026, “The Shang Shan Ruo Shui Column,” Lianhe Zaobao, Singapore.

 

2026年7月14日 星期二

《AIGC时代的人文学术研究方法》|AI进入研究以后,人文学者还有什么不可替代?Humanities Research Methods in the Age of AIGC

 


当AIGC进入资料搜集、阅读、图像分析、学术写作与知识传播,人文学者应该如何运用新的生产力,同时保留问题意识、查证能力、学术判断与研究责任?

在这支影片中,衣若芬教授从《AIGC时代的人文学术研究方法》出发,讨论AI技术如何改变人文学术研究,也进一步提出:研究者真正不可替代的,不只是写作能力,而是问题的发现、诠释的主权与判断的责任。

本书讨论的内容包括:AIGC如何参与资料搜集、阅读、分析、写作与传播;哪些研究工作可以交给AI,哪些不能交付;如何查证AI生成的资料与引文;如何记录人与AI共同工作的研究过程;如何在技术快速发展的时代,维护学术诚信与研究主体性。

AI可以帮助我们走得更快,研究方法则让我们知道自己正在往哪里走。

《AIGC时代的人文学术研究方法》现已正式发布,并持续开放订购。
特惠价至2026年7月31日止。

购书链接1:
https://forms.gle/doqk2E2gKyEEaeZb6

购书链接2:
https://p.baominggongju.com/share?eid=6a428f9cb7b9e765a566b6f9

作者:衣若芬 I Lo-fen
英文书名:Humanities Research Methods in the Age of AIGC

#AIGC #人工智能 #人文学术 #研究方法 #学术写作 #数字人文 #文图学 #衣若芬


As AIGC becomes increasingly involved in information retrieval, reading, image analysis, academic writing, and knowledge dissemination, how should humanities scholars make use of this new productive force while preserving critical inquiry, verification, scholarly judgment, and academic responsibility?

In this video, Professor I Lo-fen introduces the central ideas of her book, Humanities Research Methods in the Age of AIGC. She examines how AI is transforming humanities research and argues that what remains truly irreplaceable is not merely the ability to write, but the capacity to discover meaningful questions, retain interpretive agency, and assume responsibility for scholarly judgment.

The book discusses how AIGC can assist with research, reading, analysis, writing, and communication; which tasks may be delegated to AI and which must remain the responsibility of the researcher; how to verify AI-generated information and references; how to document human–AI collaboration; and how to preserve academic integrity and scholarly agency in a rapidly changing technological environment.

AI may help us move faster, but research methodology enables us to understand where we are going.

Humanities Research Methods in the Age of AIGC is now officially released and available for order.
The special publication price is valid until 31 July 2026.

Purchase Link 1:
https://forms.gle/doqk2E2gKyEEaeZb6

Purchase Link 2:
https://p.baominggongju.com/share?eid=6a428f9cb7b9e765a566b6f9

Author: I Lo-fen
Chinese title: 《AIGC时代的人文学术研究方法》

#AIGC #ArtificialIntelligence #HumanitiesResearch #ResearchMethods #AcademicWriting #DigitalHumanities #TextAndImageStudies #ILofen




《AIGC时代的人文学术研究方法》首批电子书今日寄发 First Batch of Humanities Research Methods in the Age of AIGC E-books to Be Sent Today

 


今天,2026年7月14日上午10点,《AIGC时代的人文学术研究方法》第一批电子书将寄发给已经订购的读者们。

我写这本书,是想认真回答:当AIGC进入资料搜集、阅读、图像分析、写作与传播,人文学者怎样使用新的生产力,同时保留问题意识、查证能力、学术判断与责任?

工具可以帮助我们走得更快,研究方法则让我们知道自己正在往哪里走。

第一批订购者请留意今天上午10点后的电邮收件箱。

已经订购、尚未发电邮给文图学会的读者们,请尽快发电邮。

订购仍持续开放,欢迎扫描海报二维码。

本书提前出版,特惠价至2026年7月31日止。


Today, July 14, 2026, at 10:00 a.m., the first batch of Humanities Research Methods in the Age of AIGC e-books will be emailed to readers who have placed their orders.

I wrote this book to address a serious question: As AIGC becomes part of data collection, reading, image analysis, writing, and dissemination, how can humanities scholars make use of this new productive power while preserving their critical awareness, ability to verify information, academic judgment, and sense of responsibility?

Tools can help us move faster, while research methods help us understand where we are going.

Readers in the first batch are kindly reminded to check their email inboxes after 10:00 a.m. today.

Readers who have already placed an order but have not yet emailed the Text and Image Studies Association are requested to do so as soon as possible.

Orders remain open. Please scan the QR code on the poster to place your order.

The book has been published ahead of schedule, and the special promotional price is available until July 31, 2026.

2026年7月6日 星期一

2026 中国人民大学文图学系列讲座:《桃花源记》的四副面孔 2026 Renmin University of China Lecture Series: The Four Faces of The Peach Blossom Spring

 





感谢中国人民大学邀请!

 从今天 2026 年 7 月 6 日-7月9日,每天下午 1:30 在线上和大家谈《桃花源记》的四副面孔。

我会介绍以下内容: 1. 什么是文图学 2. 诗画文图学 3. 绘本文图学 4. AIGC 文图学

腾讯会议号码请见海报

Thank you to Renmin University of China for the kind invitation!

From July 6 to July 9, 2026, I will be giving an online lecture series every afternoon at 1:30 p.m. on The Four Faces of The Peach Blossom Spring.

The lectures will introduce the following topics:

  1. What are Text and Image Studies?
  2. Text and Image Studies in Poetry and Painting
  3. Text and Image Studies in Picture Books
  4. Text and Image Studies on AIGC

Please refer to the posters for the Tencent Meeting IDs.


2026年7月4日 星期六

《AIGC时代的人文学术研究方法》Humanities Research Methods in the Age of AIGC


 



AI 工具会更新,方法带你走对方向。


如果你发现自己正需要 AI 使用原则、学术伦理边界、披露模板与研究方法,欢迎预购我的新书:


《AIGC 时代的人文学术研究方法》

Humanities Research Methods in the Age of AIGC

作者:衣若芬 I Lo-fen


本书不是一本 AI 工具清单,而是帮助你建立 AIGC 时代人文学术研究方法的书。


第一阶段预购同步进行中。

完成付款,才视为预购成功。


预购链接1:https://forms.gle/doqk2E2gKyEEaeZb6

预购链接 2:https://p.baominggongju.com/share?eid=6a428f9cb7b9e765a566b6f9

2026年6月16日 星期二

春江水暖谁先知 Who First Senses the Spring?

 


作者:田柯

2026年6月4日14:30-17:00由云南大学艺术与设计学院至公讲堂主办、由新加坡南洋理工大学人文学院衣若芬教授主讲的《春江水暖谁先知—从苏轼题画诗到AIGC文图学的感知重构》开讲了,讲座吸引云南大学众多学院学生和老师参加,座无虚席,讲座过程中观众们全神贯注,悉心聆听,反响热烈。虽然天气炎热,但是无人打瞌睡和中途离场,是我参加的讲座里为数极少的成功讲座之一。

首先衣若芬教授,初印象是和上海艺术学院胡建君教授一模一样的发型,齐刘海的短发,都是文学博士,声音同样温婉甜美,都是深耕中国诗画和文学研究数载的女性学者,正如王新院长所述:“衣教授是古典与时尚的结合”,古典指的是古典修为,诗词造诣和品味是一流的,多年以来对苏东坡研究非常深入,时尚是指,她具有开宗立派的抱负和作为,有着开阔的视野和前瞻的学术研究,是全球第一个有着文科学术背景来研究AIGC的专家,是文图学的创始人,是全球第一个开设AIGC文图学课程在新加坡南洋理工大学的教授。她的开拓创新是划时代的,真厉害!

这次讲座以文图学的视野带我们进入苏轼的这首《惠崇春江晚景》题画诗,从源起惠崇僧人的画到苏轼的题画诗,从最早版本日本金泽文库旧藏的“晓景”非现在“晚景”深入,解构苏轼的如何重组观看,运用文图学跨学科研究视角,现场演示了由诗词指令AI生成的图片和音乐,探讨了在AIGC蓬勃发展的当代,文学经典如何与科技浪潮激荡出新的火花,算法如何转译“可见与可听”,带出人文研究又将如何回应的疑问?

带着问题,衣若芬教授梳理了文图学的发展历程,时代坐标,以及全面解释了AIGC文图学概念,提出三层结构的底层逻辑和四步骤路径的应对之道,包括解构的底层逻辑从感知层到媒介层最后到智能层的三层结构,以及四步骤分别是视其外观—察其类型—解其形构—论其意涵,且螺旋式深化的非线性往返过程。结合艺术史,文图学和Aigc文图学不同维度比较分析,详细说明了人文研究从1.0到2.0到如今3.0时代三次转型,论证了从传统感知在先的人类创作发展到AIGC的机器生成时代特征和表现,最后得出人机协作从感知到媒介再到智能的发展趋势,探讨了与感知重构的结合。同时指出隐秘的危机以及面对的问题,最后强调了AIGC文图学四大核心学术贡献。

衣若芬教授研究视角立足于文图学,又开拓创新到AIGC的文图学,尤其关注人文研究何去何从,人类在AI日益强大且容易的情况下,人类的意义是什么?她提出了文图学的理论框架,在AI使用和AIGC关系中给我们一个定位:AI是系统,是算法,是技术体系,但是AIGC是结果,是帮助人类建立核心人类能力,即深刻的理解力,独立的判断力以及高效的协作能力,人类要重拾判断和责任,发展的重点不是创造本身,而是去理解意义是如何被创造的,我们如何去做真伪的判断。

当AI负责生成的时候,我们的理解很重要。
最后回归主题,印证了AIGC文图学概念:万物皆文本,文本可生成,理解生成的世界。

今天的讲座精彩纷呈,衣若芬教授,带着文图学的思维方式和独特视角,让我们开启了一场跨越千年的文化对话(1085年苏轼创作这首诗的年份到如今2026年)。

讲座期间,大家进行了广泛而深入的探讨和思考,同学一直保持高涨的学习热情,我也孜孜不倦,非常喜欢这场讲座的分享。

这是衣若芬教授以苏轼诗词的深情画意,结合丰富的美学,文学,历史研究分析,以及深厚的文学底蕴、扎实的文学功底和审美意识,更是以开拓创新的思想,让我们在文学诗画里和AIGC文图学中相互凝视,相互成全,相互融合发展。

太喜欢您,衣若芬教授,外表柔弱但是内心强大,驰骋学术的劲头让人肃然起敬!心生佩服!特别喜欢您幽默风趣的教学风格,做您的学生太开心了!他们真有福气,课程内容多有意思啊,试想哪位同学舍得上课睡觉甚至缺席的,根本舍不得啊,这么好的课程,我表示羡慕南洋理工大学的学生们!

现在3.0时代了,我们只相信我们想相信的,而且那是我认为的美就代表了我自己!


2026年5月11日 星期一

你真的会用 AI 做学术研究吗?Do You Really Know How to Use AI for Academic Research?


 你现在怎样使用 AI?


是还在观望?

是已经开始使用,却不知道边界在哪里?

是担心 AI 影响原创性、学术伦理与研究判断?

还是已经想把 AI 纳入自己的研究方法?


我设计了一个 AIGC 学术人格测试,帮助你看见自己在 AIGC 时代的研究状态。


10 题测出你属于哪一种类型:

观望者、适用者、焦虑者,还是方法建构者。


AI 工具会更新,方法带你走对方向。


如果你发现自己正需要 AI 使用原则、学术伦理边界、披露模板与研究方法,欢迎预购我的新书:


《AIGC 时代的人文学术研究方法》

Humanities Research Methods in the Age of AIGC

作者:衣若芬 I Lo-fen


本书不是一本 AI 工具清单,而是帮助你建立 AIGC 时代人文学术研究方法的书。


第一阶段预购同步进行中。

完成付款,才视为预购成功。


测试链接:https://tally.so/r/GxY8eO


预购链接1:https://forms.gle/doqk2E2gKyEEaeZb6

预购链接 2:https://p.baominggongju.com/share?eid=69f993cdc1e7273224f92119



How are you using AI in your academic work?


Are you still observing from a distance?

Have you started using AI but remain unsure about its boundaries?

Are you worried about originality, academic integrity, and research judgment?

Or are you ready to integrate AI into your own research methodology?


I designed the AIGC Academic Persona Test to help you understand your research mindset in the age of AIGC.


In 10 questions, discover which type you are:

the Observer, the Practitioner, the Anxious User, or the Method Builder.


AI tools evolve. Method leads the way.


If you find yourself needing clearer principles, ethical boundaries, disclosure templates, and research methods for using AI in academic work, you are welcome to pre-order my new book:


Humanities Research Methods in the Age of AIGC

《AIGC 时代的人文学术研究方法》

Author: I Lo-fen 衣若芬


This is not a book of AI tool lists.

It is a book about building humanities research methods in the age of AIGC.


The first-stage pre-order is now open.

A pre-order is confirmed only after payment is completed.


Test link: https://tally.so/r/GxY8eO


Pre-order link 1: https://forms.gle/doqk2E2gKyEEaeZb6

Pre-order link 2:  https://p.baominggongju.com/share?eid=69f993cdc1e7273224f92119